Failure likely in Del Rio's bid for water district organization in 2007
By Bill Sontag
Feature Writer It’s only posturing and sparring now, but proponents of “protection” for your aquatic wealth are edging toward open warfare to protect their own special interests in local aquifers.
Del Rio and Val Verde County are geographic anomalies in the “western water wars” simply because water is so abundant at this crossroads of the Chihuahuan Desert and the Tamaulipan Brushlands. Water is supposed to be scarce in desert scrub, but we are surrounded by it.
Now, a valiant attempt to create a democratically elected protective mechanism – a Val Verde County Groundwater Conservation District (GWCD) – grows in importance, inverse in relation to its likelihood of success. Three factions – ranchers, municipalities, and environmentalists – may be failing in their last-ditch effort to shield the region’s most precious natural resource from the predations of inside greed and outside water markets. Is the GWCD effort stagnant?
Three rivers – the Pecos, Devils, and Rio Grande – converge here, pooling a giant reservoir that, on a hot, summer day, evaporates more water than most small cities need to survive. And the San Felipe Springs just east of town yield a reputed 90 million gallons of clean, truly beautiful water every day. Water is everywhere. It lubricated the city’s late 19th century birth, spawned vineyards and crops, watered vast herds of livestock, fueled railroads, irrigated lawns, and fostered tourism.Now, water serves as a “carrot” – since a “stick” will accomplish nothing – to attract business and industry, while most Del Rioans take it for granted, fostering a dubious reputation for the worst water conservation efforts in southwest Texas.
With little time left before a state water planning board moves in to take control over water distribution and allocations, a Val Verde County Water Planning Committee strives to pull all competing interests together in search of common ground. Instead, it appears that old differences and pecuniary motives have been revived and given new life. And the efforts, to date, are diverging, rather than coalescing.
“The bottom line on the groundwater conservation district issue is that no one trusts anybody,” said Del Rio City Councilman Mike Wrob. “I keep trying to work from a position of trust, and I can’t get anybody to work that way,” Wrob lamented, Thursday (Dec. 21, 2006). The committee is under the gun to craft legislation to be advanced by Texas Rep. Pete P. Gallego to create a GWCD here.
Since the legislature only meets every two years, Gallego has repeatedly told the committee to get busy. If it fails to get legislative authorization to create the district and the protective conservation measures that go with it, the Texas State Water Development Board may be authorized to set restrictions and allocations for us. And that, Gallego said, could happen before another legislature is seated to consider a third GWCD effort from Val Verde County.
In 2004, Jerry Simpton, president of The Bank & Trust, and others forged a draft bill to create a county GWCD. Local disagreements with it festered and bubbled up in Austin, and the effort failed. On June 21, 2006, a dozen ranchers, attorneys, civic leaders and businessmen convened at Del Rio City Hall, 109 W. Broadway, to try again to agree on legislative language.Between then and now, Gallego has counseled the group and factions within in it about the importance of compromise and collaboration to avoid a standoff on this important issue. His imprecations notwithstanding, hopes are growing dim for a breach of the current impasse.
If there is any substantive agreement among the three factions, the “landowners” (ranchers) stand apart from officials of the City of Del Rio and from environmental interests representing those who want to preserve springflows for the riparian zones along San Felipe Creek. The city wants to ensure water for a growing business community, and the environmentalists want safeguarded habitat for increasingly rare aquatic organisms, and both are determined to protect the aesthetic values of the creek corridor.
Both of the latter two factions have drafted legislative proposals that are nearly devoid of specific limits or allocations of water from available sources, asserting that an elected GWCD board of directors should, first, conduct scientific investigations to learn the nature of subterranean water – flow, volume, origin, quality, and variability of all those characteristics during plentiful and drought supplies. They call it “good science,” adamant that decisions on allocations are unconscionable without it.
The “landowner” (ranchers) faction has been represented on the committee by Byron Hodge, Justin Burke, T.J. Jarrett, John Weston and “Tuffy” Whitehead. They are leery of any proposal that fails to acknowledge their historic right to use whatever water is pooled directly under their vast holdings of county land. The environmental and municipal factions worry that that “rule of capture,” historic Texas law, could put ranchers in the driver’s seat to sell water to high bidding interests out of the county.
Saturday night (Dec. 23), Jarrett commented, “It’s kind of a difficult situation. I wish the city could have their own district and we could have ours, but we can’t please everybody, and we hope there can be some give-and-take. If they [all other factions] want to register every well, and not grandfather all the wells that now exist, then we’re pretty far apart.”
Wrob, serving as the steady representative of Del Rio City Council on the GWCD committee, queries, “What’s the point of having a groundwater district if you’re never going to have any restrictions in place, and everybody’s allowed to pump all the water they want?” Wrob, Councilman Rudy Chapa and City Attorney David Sorola have represented the city’s interests.Wrob, Hodge, Weston, Simpton, and Scott McWilliams, project director for The Nature Conservancy, met with Gallego Dec. 15, reaching little accord, but heard suggestions from Gallego to break the deadlock. “The ranchers just want everything spelled out in the legislation now,” Wrob recapped, reiterating his belief that details must be first supported by scientific research.
Jane Morain, GWCD committee member and environmental advocate, is unconvinced that the three factions can find enough common ground to submit a single legislative proposal to Gallego. Morain, her husband Gene Morain, and citizen volunteer Ron Burton have worked diligently to advance the health and appeal of San Felipe Creek. Of the other interests in a proposed district, Morain said, “There’s a little air of paranoia among some of those folks, and that’s why Ron [Burton] has pulled together all the elements that are needed in this bill.”
Gene Morain and Burton met with Gallego Saturday morning (Dec. 16), but also came away with little optimism for reconciliation of factional interests. “It was probably a meeting in which there were no unnecessary words,” Morain said Sunday (Dec. 24).
But, as to any likelihood of accord, Morain exclaimed, “You can’t bring those factions together any more than you can get a bunch of monkeys to play a Beethoven symphony.”
You must be registered and logged in to post comments
- Login or register to post comments
- Email this page
Do you like or dislike this story? Please take a quick survey to help us improve. Click here.










The DRNH has been on the
The DRNH has been on the water story from the start, despite propaganda to the contrary. Also the DRNH presents the news - not just the water story but also the stories people want to read about - and yes, that includes the wrecks, arrests, drug busts and beauty pageants - without including the opinions of the writers, and that is appriciated because thats what makes a credible news organization.
Ok so lets see the water
Ok so lets see the water issue has been an ongoing one for how many years now? The DRNH only printed the past couple of articles because they knew that people were up in arms about it. I subscribe to the DRNH, it has some good articles. I like the ability to be interactive with the news though, but as I pointed out in another post, there are in fact differences and some are not very subtle.
Again as I have said, I do subscribe to the DRNH and I will continue to do so as I like my news from varied sources. I am aware that the DRNH received a new Editor, and I have noticed some changes in the paper. But you are completely mistaken about opinions being left out. Simply refusing to cover a hot issue by saying you don't want to influence it is just another way of influencing that issue. Simply refusing to print controversial material because it is a personal attack and then printing others that attack is another way of opinionating material.
I don't think that anyone can successfully argue against the credibility of the articles that they "do" print since the definition of credibility is;
credible (adj.) Capable of being believed; plausible.
(adj.) Worthy of confidence; reliable.
I would however like to point out the second part of this definiton. The part about confidence. I do not and I repeat do not have confidence that the DRNH will print all the news that is the news. I would point out our recent elections and the issues therein. This town was aflame with controversy about Mike Fernandez and then the accusations of election fraud. What paper worth the oxygen it's employee's consume would pass up on an election fraud story. Hmm maybe one where the Publisher had no interest in seeing the opponent of Mike Fernandez have any sort of positive press? Oh but once it was over and done with they did print a story about the re-count but no story preceeded it on the fact that there was going to be a re-count "just in case I guess".
So is the DRNH credible? I guess that will depend upon your point of view.
It happens in three's ya
It happens in three's ya know....three very notable and respected people have passed away in the last seven days. President Gerald R. Ford, who like Tito Puente, music isn't missed until they are gone. James Brown, who makes me thank GOOOOOOOD I wasn't born a mike stand, and Dr. Frank Stanton. He was 98. He was hired by William S. Paley in 1932 to help bring cohesion to the Columbia Broadcasting System and set the mold for CBS News. News journalist, such as Edwin R. Murrow, Robert Trout, Eric Sevareid, and Fred Friendly flourished in the design of modern mass media. These men are the bedrock, Stanton was the steward of the rules. Radio news was an easy transition to television under the Stanton style, regarded by the Rather's and Cronkite's as the bible. It has been somewhat diluted in recent years by the cable news moguls but much of the standard manages to apply, sometimes. So excuse my chuckle tonight at the previous blog citing credible news with car wrecks, drug bust, beauty pageants, and bar fight arrests. That rumble you hear is not an approaching thunderstorm or an empty ulcer filled stomach before an 11 o'clock deadline. It's Dr. Frank's laughter from above. Amen.
So, forgive me, but when I read the hit and run blog entries regarding "scoops" followed by linking the words of 'credible news' with car wrecks and beauty pageants, but it makes me want to 'fire up the fingers.' The passion is so hot, that I'm say in' to hell with William Strunk's 'Element of Style' you smart people are just gonna have'ta bear it. Amen.
News is subjective information of fact for public knowledge, and for the common good of it's audience. If implemented properly, it will raise question, bring unresolved issues into proper light, and spark First Amendment freedom of opinion regarding fact.
"Scoop" in the journalistic sense is defined this way according to the online 'Etymology Dictionary'; ..news published before a rival. It received it's American-English definition in 1874 after years of commercial slang evolution as early as the 1850's. In our little speck of the rock, nobody's scooping' nobody.
The DRNH chooses it's credible approach of Monday's city council meetings by print on Tuesday afternoon along with car wrecks, bar room fights and who's Lil Miss Whatcamacallit.
Live takes a more introspective approach regarding issues that represent the community in whole. It's a matter of preference. If Live chose to go for 'ta scoop' it's banner moniker would have to be retitled 'the Baskin Robins Gazette' Alot of trade Mark issues for Mr. Hyde, Amen.
News is competitive. Those who focus merely on watching constantly what the other guy is doing will loose some who's first preference was theirs. Believe me, I know.
It's my belief that the DRNH does present credible news. For my taste, it is not enough. I can do without the car wrecks, drug bust, and bar room fight reports. That's 'chisme'. It only supports the interest of the person's directly involved and the police officer who writes the report.
The DRNH, as the heritage news source, has to cater to all citizens for subjective news. It's very challenging for its editors to create a format with a better balance, at least to my personal taste. It's hard to serve everyone. That's a very difficult task for a 77 year old institution to position itself with the Internet and news on demand via cellular telephones. Newspaper executives at the Dallas Morning News, Chicago Trib, Denver Post, Kansas City Star, all great papers face the same concerns as the DRNH. I don't think scoopin is the answer,Amen. It's a better design of news preference. But what do I know, I'm a non existing preacher.
My hope is that the community benefits in knowledge and genuine concern through competition of Live and the DRNH. It will not be healthy through scoop or speed. Accuracy, clarity, and balance benefits the common good and perseverance of the fourth and fifth estates.
That all said, Dr. Frank Stanton will finish his chuckling, and join President Ford in doin' the camel walk with Butane James. St. Peter, put them dancin' shoes on and take it to ta'bridge
Heh Heh Hehaaaaaallllllllllleeeeeeeelllllluuuuuuuuuuuya
The Reverend Ike. Amen.
Well put Rev, and I hope you
Well put Rev, and I hope you won't mind, if in the future I quote this; "News is subjective information of fact for public knowledge, and for the common good of it's audience. If implemented properly, it will raise question, bring unresolved issues into proper light, and spark First Amendment freedom of opinion regarding fact".
A belated Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you Rev.
and a belated Merry
and a belated Merry Christmas to you Amor, and I don't mind at all if you use the quote. Funny thing, Mrs. Ike was standing of over my shoulder when I wrote it. She said it didn't sound like the Reverend Ike....and I was the one drinkin' the holy water, Amen.....so beloved another serrrrrrrmmmmonnnettee to ring in the new year.....
Out with the old, in with the new...
Did you get the bottle of Korbel, or was that a shot for the flu
Britney left K and is now hangin out with Paris,
Tony proposed to Eva..France to wed after the Spurs take on the east an embarrassss
Ta' first is on Monday, with hangovers louder than Heaven's vet....
Kinda confusin for the cocktail amatuer, wakin' up Sunday afternoon sayin' "Is it 2007 yet'
HAAALLLLhickupLLLLLLhickupLLLLLLLLhicanotherleaseEEEEEEwereoutaiceLLLLLLcheesedipanyoneUUUYYA
The Reverend Ike. Amen
Has anyone here noticed that
Has anyone here noticed that even though the LIVE! might "scoop" the DRHS, most of their stories are on local businesses...not real news...
some "scoop" eh...
Business IS news in this
Business IS news in this growing town, and others around us, and to discount it or ignore it is to turn a blind eye to what's running the city.
But the flip side is that we cover many issues that resonate with the entire, thinking community.
Water issues are of paramount importance now, and will only continue to be.
We've paid a great deal of attention to schools, with the entire focus of our September edition. (And, by the way, your reference to "DRHS" is the acknowledged abbreviation for Del Rio High School, and I assure you we are not competing with that important institution.)
Laughlin, too, was the target of an entire monthly magazine edition.
The arts -- visual and performing -- have captured a lot of attention here, and will continue.
Transportation issues and road and bridge projects are also high on our radar screen.
Now, what we don't do is "ambulance chasing," every drug deal gone bad, grass and brush fires, the plethora of beauty contests, and professional wrestling. If those are news to you, you may want to look elsewhere.
Bill Sontag
Feature Writer
Del Rio LIVE!
Those in self-employed
Those in self-employed businesses will grasp the reasoning for local human-interest business related stories, which are really quite informative.
Those who receive regular paychecks may never grasp the reasoning of same.
And that's not news? What is
And that's not news? What is your definition of news? Just curious. Here's a couple of definitons from the American Heritage Dictionary for you;
news (pl.n.) Information about recent events or happenings, especially as reported by
newspapers, periodicals, radio, or television.
news (pl.n.) New information of any kind
The main Diff that I see between LIVE and the DRNH "well other than the fact that one takes up space in my trash can once I'm done with it" is the fact that DRNH won't touch certain stories and the fact that LIVE allows an interaction between both the reporters and the "avg Joe". Oh and not to mention the fact that if you or I, do or do not like something that LIVE did or did not print it can be posted here and discussed.
And about LIVE reporting on local businesses, think of this like a Rorschach test, you see what dominates your thoughts. So if you look at LIVE and you are already thinking "man there are a lot of articles about business here, then thats all you "will" see. I'm not disagreeing whith what percentage of the stories are about business though, since I havent and won't take the time to count. But I would like to point out that the DRNH studiously avoids reporting on Business. The only time you will see anything on a business is when one, opens, pays for the space in the paper or burns down in a spectacular manner.
If this is not the right
If this is not the right place for this, move it or delete. But it is true.
When the state stepped in on the water turbidity problem some years ago, after the city asked for still another extension, we read about it in the San Antonio paper. When San Miguel was asked why it wasn't in the Del Rio paper a week later (we watched for it and went to his office) he informed us that he decided what went in the paper, we didn't. The state stepping in on your city's water safety problems was not important enough to be given to the public.
The information that is published isn't done so in a timely manner. Some information is as much as 2 or 3 weeks old by the time it is published. By definition news should mean it is new. I wish I had known about the home office's questionaire when they were asking how satisfied people were with the Herald.
Has anyone here noticed that
Has anyone here noticed that even though LIVE! might "scoop" the DRHS, most of the stories are on businesses...not news
big scoop eh...
Bill, My comments were
Bill,
My comments were posted under the wrong topic earlier, I was referring to this article and the water issue.
Sorry bill,
This was posted under the wrong topic earlier, this is the article that I was referring to and the questions pertain to the water issue.
Submitted by Tellitlikeitis on Wed, 12/27/2006 - 8:40am.
"Bill,
I wish you would briefly state what each side's wants are! I would like to know the following;
What areas of this proposal do they all have in common?
What areas of the proposal do they need to compromise on?"
I would be interested to
I would be interested to know who all the ranchers are, instead of just a few being identified by name. Is Nettleton in that group also to represent the county?
The information on Fort Stockton and Comanche Springs is public knowledge. Especially if you have lived in Fort Stockton. Not new public knowledge but well known nevertheless. Has to be before Ann Richards was elected governor by several years. The family of Clayton Williams were, and may still be, the land owners. He was asked about it during the campaign for governor.
The environmentalists are
Also representing the city
Also representing the city are City Councilman Rudy Chapa, City Engineer Alejandro Garcia, and Perry Widener.
County representative Diana Salgado generally aligns herself with the environmentalists.
County appointee Justin Burke is a land owner but has been pretty quiet at the meetings.
Story coming up this
Story coming up this morning. Took a little longer to develop than I expected.
Bill Sontag
Feature Writer
Del Rio LIVE!
Maybe they will want to
Maybe they will want to review Comanche Springs at Fort Stockton with a former capacity of 21 million gallons a day and is now dry. It was legally pumped dry for irrigation by a land owner. Some entity needs to protect this county and its abundant water resources from that kind of thing happening here.
This is very important
This is very important information that we newcomers to the area didn't know. Why don't you call Del Rio News Herald, Del Rio Live or the Express News? I am sure one of them will follow with the story.
Why wouldn't *I* call the
Why wouldn't *I* call the local rag and tell them? Because THIS IS A SCOOP on the local rag. We beat them to the important issues of the day. We do so on a frequent basis. Welcome to LIVE! your real news replacement.
My question to you is, why would you spend money on something (the local rag) that isn't informing you?
Joe Hyde
In addition to just beating
In addition to just beating them on a frequent basis, you also have to take into consideration all the stories that you guy's put up here that the DRNH won't touch with a ten meter cattle prod because of "Politics?" Yeah Right! A certain person there is more worried or concerned about pissing off certain friends of his, than he is in asking questions and getting certain crucial news out to the public.
By "you" I meant the
By "you" I meant the anonymous person that made the post.
I agree with you, the latest real information is provided by DRL; also the postings are great. Congratulations on the success.
I have the subscription to the DRNH not because I get usable information, but because printed cheap paper is real good for cleaning my building windows! (lol)
You, and your staff, have a great new year!